California gay weddings continue

Search

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
2,228
Tokens
California gay weddings can go on


Gay weddings have come to a small New York town
California's Supreme Court has refused a request from the state's attorney general to halt gay weddings.
More than 3,400 same-sex couples have married, since San Francisco's mayor began issuing licences two weeks ago.

The court told conservative groups who oppose the weddings, which contravene state law, to file new legal briefs in one week's time.

On Friday, 21 gay and lesbian couples exchanged vows at a village hall in New Paltz, New York.


The Mayor of New Paltz, 26-year-old Jason West, said he decided to perform same sex wedding ceremonies as a matter of equal rights.

The same argument has been against by San Francisco Mayor Gavin Newsom, whose spokesman says he is only following "the state constitution, which explicitly outlaws discrimination of any kind".

But after Mayor West started holding ceremonies, the Governor of New York State, George Pataki, said it was in clear breach of state law which defined marriage as a union between a man and a woman.


Mayor Newsom says he is just following the state constitution
"What we're witnessing in America today is the flowering of the largest civil rights movement the country's had in a generation," countered Mr West, a member of the Green Party.

The issue has prompted George W Bush to call for a constitutional amendment defining marriage in traditional terms.

"Marriage between a man and a woman is the ideal,» President Bush said on Friday.

"And the job of the president is to drive policy toward the ideal."


Legal ruling


California's Attorney General Bill Lockyer had asked the state Supreme Court to halt any further gay marriages, and annul the licences already issued since the weddings began on 12 February.


More than 3,000 gay couples have wed in San Francisco
"It's a matter of statewide concern and voters want to know, Californians want to know and couples that participated in ceremonies need to know the status of their relationship," he said.

California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger had pressed Mr Lockyer to seek the clarification.

"I believe strongly in the law that we have right now in California, which respects domestic partnership and I think that's a very good law," said the governor, earlier in the week.

But the judges refused to take action, and told opponents' of gay weddings to file briefs to the court at the end of next week.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/3495020.stm
 

Another Day, Another Dollar
Joined
Mar 1, 2002
Messages
42,730
Tokens
I do not think this is proper and mans law is not to over power the law of GOD.
 

jen

Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
2
Tokens
I say, whatever makes someone happy is just fine with me. I don't think it is constitutional to tell someone who they can or cannot love, and certainly not fair for people to be excluded from life benefits due to sexual preference.

“To help people reach their highest potential, catch them doing something right. “
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
2,228
Tokens
My 'accept them' motivation is reinforced by the contributions that gays have made over the millenia.

Alexander the Great and Mozart were at the very least, bisexual, and probably homosexual.
Their achievements have never been surpassed, by anyone, ever.
That's anyone. Ever.

Other lesser mortals that spring to mind are the FBI dude Hoover and Cecil Rhodes.

They may be different, but if you get a smart one, they are worldbeaters.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
2,228
Tokens
Its getting more and more complicated...the variations of the human race.
icon_biggrin.gif


Do you this man, sorry...woman, take this woman...sorry, man to be your lawful wedded person?
------------------------------------

Sex-change weddings upset clergy

Some Anglican priests are threatening to resign if they are forced to allow people who have changed their sex to marry in their churches.
Many clergy do not accept that people can change sex using surgery, and see such weddings as same sex marriages.

However, under the Gender Recognition Bill, soon to become law, clergy in England and Wales will be unable to prevent their churches being used.

A clause will allow clergy to refuse to carry out the weddings themselves.

Traditionalist Anglicans claim the law effectively forces the Church to marry people of the same sex.

Some clergy say they would rather resign their posts than allow their churches to be used.

The law has been welcomed by some liberal Anglicans, but traditionalists fear it could establish a precedent that paves the way for same-sex blessings, or even marriages.

Anglican vicars - whose role includes being a registrar of marriage - are generally obliged to marry couples who want a church wedding, but many would be inclined to refuse those who have changed sex.

However, under the legislation people who have sex-change surgery - or who convince a qualified person that their body does not represent their true gender - gain the right to have their new sex recognised.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/3496806.stm
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,119,189
Messages
13,565,185
Members
100,761
Latest member
jhavock123
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com